Sunday, 29 March 2009
Island Trip Part 10
Friday, 27 March 2009
Short Story
I wish there were something new I could say about it, some great insight that a hundred thousand poets have missed over the course of human existence, but in the end it’s such an insignificant, unimaginative little thing.
We were in love. Now we are not.
You were never abusive. I was never abusive. We fought, but only as ‘nice‘ people fight; acid splashes of words, fading to nothing over the course of time. How easily they were forgiven. The worst thing you ever said was that I was selfish. I probably said the same about you. Everyone’s selfish sometimes. We weren’t even interesting in our flaws.
I think we were passionate in the beginning, but even passion is ordinary. In the beginning, surely everyone’s stomach drops away at the lightest of touches? At that first, agonizing separation, surely everyone spends every waking moment with loneliness wriggling inside like desperate fish.
How did anyone ever think love came from the heart? It’s in the guts – the stomach, the bowels. Romance tends to veer away from guts. I suppose it’s down to the arrogance of humanity, wanting their most primal urges to be associated with beauty. Sexual love isn’t beautiful. Not in any way. It’s sweaty, sticky, irrational, animalistic. You can soft-pedal it by differentiating between sex and love, but even if you care about the person you’re writhing around with, it’s still as sweaty, sticky, irrational and animalistic. You just have more to talk about afterwards.
It’s all so boringly predictable.
We met. We were thirty-ish – old enough to have seen our fair share of broken relationships, but not old enough to be jaded. We were in different offices but the same building, and one year our Christmas parties over-spilled and we ended up drinking cheap vodka in your boss’s office. We talked for hours, until the sun came up and caught the motes of dust rising from the carpet. It was, actually, a beautiful sunrise. It caught the old stone of the buildings, touching them with pink until they glowed. We stood at the large window and watched, talking softly about ourselves.
Is there anything more satisfying that explaining yourself to someone? Even with an ordinary person it’s a joyous experience. When you find yourself with someone who coos with pleasure over every insight, matching it with their own like a child playing mental snap, it’s like a revelation. It fills you. I found myself trembling with the pleasure of it.
After that, I couldn’t stop thinking about you. I tried to run into you at every available opportunity – a task made so much easier by the fact you were obviously doing the same thing. We started eating at the same awful café. Our work suffered as we threw caution to the wind, extending our lunch breaks as far as our colleagues’ patience allowed.
Eventually we went to dinner.
Eventually, we went to bed.
Then, for a long time, we couldn’t seem to stop going to bed. We would kiss for hours, missing the sensation so much that we’d dive straight back mere moments after pausing for breath. We went from careful, exploratory sex to astonishing, all-encompassing, perfect sex. We imprinted on each other - every curve and nuance learned. From there we could experiment, knowing always that if something was strange, something unpleasant, we could slip back into the familiar routine.
But experimentation takes imagination, and there’s only so much to go round. After a while the everyday nonsense of living intrudes, and in sharing bathrooms and illnesses, drudgery and exhaustion, habits and peccadilloes (none of them interesting), the heat begins to wane.
That’s where love comes in. If you love someone, warmth is enough. Warmth, in fact, is good. It’s comforting. Comfortable. It allows you to be relaxed, to shed outer layers, to be yourself. Perhaps, occasionally, you’ll remember how it was before and experience a pang or two of nostalgia – but it won’t be enough to send you into a world of glances with strangers, lingering drinks at the bar, tangled limbs and upheaval. You love this person. You’ve made a life with them. They know you better than anyone else in the world. The thought of starting again with someone new, someone who might not put up with your habits and peccadilloes, who might, in the course of an argument, call you something far worse than selfish - no, that couldn’t be further from your mind. You are, at last, a Couple. You think in unison, often catching yourselves communicating in half-sentences. You know what, and what not to buy at the supermarket should you find yourself shopping on your own. You can choose each other’s meals off a restaurant menu, and it pleases you each time you get it right. In fact, you are so in tune with one another you’ve almost melded. Have you lost parts of yourself along the way? Perhaps. If so, you don’t mourn the loss. You’re better this way.
There are some people who love for the rest of their lives. They still feel their stomachs swoop, still have the imagination to experiment in bed. They play mental snap and ‘guess what I’m going to order’ and writhe and revel in the warmth of it all.
But not us. The game just wasn’t fun any more. We looked back and thought about love and saw nothing but the mundane. We’d done what everyone does. We’d experienced nothing new. For some people, that’s enough. For some, it’s success. For us, it was just one long, slow descent into sadness.
Love just faded into the background. No fireworks, no screams and broken crockery, no hate. If we wasted all those years, we’re not bitter about it. It’s just one of those things. Just the way life goes, sometimes. Just the end.
Thursday, 26 March 2009
Island Trip Part 9
Wednesday, 25 March 2009
Island Trip Part 8
Tuesday, 24 March 2009
Island Trip Part 7
Monday, 23 March 2009
Island Trip Part 6
Sunday, 22 March 2009
Island Trip Part 5
Friday, 20 March 2009
Update on Previous
Island Trip Part 4
Thursday, 19 March 2009
Island Trip Part 3
Monday, 16 March 2009
Island Trip Part 2
Saturday, 14 March 2009
IslandTrip Part 1
Friday, 13 March 2009
Pinched From Running & Thinking
1. Changes in my pants.
2. Fingers in the Factories in my pants.
3. On My Own in my pants (which I'm quite relieved about).
4. Lost On the Stoop in my pants (possibly suffering from Alzheimers? And almost certainly about to be arrested).
5. Middle Eastern Holiday in my pants.
6. Brockagh Braes in my pants. (Time for a waxing?)
7. In the Crossfire in my pants.
8. Champagne for my Real Friends, Real Pain for my Sham Friends in my pants.
9. Virgin State of Mind in my pants. (Waaahahaha!! Funny cos it's true).
10. Moons and Horror Shows in my pants. (Again, astonishingly accurate. At least I have the decency to keep my moon covered, though.)
Wednesday, 11 March 2009
Thoughts on Abuse
Obviously, this thought was preposterous to me, but I couldn't get that statistic out of my head. 1 in 4?? It couldn't be right. So I did some digging on t'internet and discovered that it's not true ... not in the sense I'd taken it, anyway. It's not 25% of women. However, according to womens aid, it is 1 in 4 women - over the course of their lifetime. 6-10% of women in any one year. My immediate reaction was "thank God." Remember, I was going from the hideous thought that 25% was the claimed number. It only took a second, though, before the horror of this situation hit me. 6-10% in one year?? Let me try and put that in some kind of rough perspective.
Population in the UK is 61 million. Let's say half of those are women - so 30.5 million.
1 in 5 people in the UK are under 16, which makes 12,200000 - divided by 2, making 6,100000 females under 16. So, we're talking about 24,400000 women. Except we're not, because domestic abuse drops sharply as women get older. Let's say we're talking about 20 million women in the UK. I'm probably hideously wrong. 20 million out of 30.5 million of an age to have a domestic relationship? Well ... it sounds ok.
So - 6-10% in any one year. At best, that makes 1.2 million women affected. At worst, it's 2 million.
2 million women being abused by their partners in a year. And there's worse to come.
Over 2 women a week are killed by their partner, or ex-partner. I think the advert I watched said domestic abuse is the primary cause of death in women between the ages of 15 and 55 - but don't quote me on that.
Domestic abuse worsens during a woman's pregnancy, and if there are children in the house.
I could go on. I could mention that most domestic abuse goes unreported. I could also mention that it's not only women, that men suffer domestic abuse as well - but that the numbers are considerably smaller. I could go on and on. I won't, because there's just too much. But I will say:
Of all female homicide victims, 42% are killed by current or former partners. 4% of male homicides are due to their partners. However, I'd ask how many more men are victims of homicide than women in general? I know that men are around 3 times more likely to be victims of assault, so I'd imagine that the numbers of male homicide victims are much larger than female - but I don't know.
I'd also like to point out that domestic abuse isn't just physical. According to the government, it's defined as:
"Any incident of threatening behaviour, violence or abuse (psychological, physical, sexual, financial or emotional) between adults who are or have been intimate partners or family members, regardless of gender or sexuality." This includes issues of concern to black and minority ethnic (BME) communities such as so called 'honour killings'."
Domestic abuse, in other words, can be compltely non violent. Here are a list of the signs of domestic abuse, according to women's aid:
- Destructive criticism and verbal abuse: shouting/mocking/accusing/name calling/verbally threatening
- Pressure tactics: sulking, threatening to withhold money, disconnect the telephone, take the car away, commit suicide, take the children away, report you to welfare agencies unless you comply with his demands regarding bringing up the children, lying to your friends and family about you, telling you that you have no choice in any decisions.
- Disrespect: persistently putting you down in front of other people, not listening or responding when you talk, interrupting your telephone calls, taking money from your purse without asking, refusing to help with childcare or housework.
- Breaking trust: lying to you, withholding information from you, being jealous, having other relationships, breaking promises and shared agreements.
- Isolation: monitoring or blocking your telephone calls, telling you where you can and cannot go, preventing you from seeing friends and relatives.
- Harassment: following you, checking up on you, opening your mail, repeatedly checking to see who has telephoned you, embarrassing you in public.
- Threats: making angry gestures, using physical size to intimidate, shouting you down, destroying your possessions, breaking things, punching walls, wielding a knife or a gun, threatening to kill or harm you and the children.
- Sexual violence: using force, threats or intimidation to make you perform sexual acts, having sex with you when you don't want to have sex, any degrading treatment based on your sexual orientation.
- Physical violence: punching, slapping, hitting, biting, pinching, kicking, pulling hair out, pushing, shoving, burning, strangling.
- Denial: saying the abuse doesn't happen, saying you caused the abusive behaviour, being publicly gentle and patient, crying and begging for forgiveness, saying it will never happen again.
So, the question is: are the reports of domestic abuse always justified? Is a woman going to have a blazing row with her partner and decide to call it in as a method of punishment? And if this is the case, do those statistics get recorded? I'm not saying that screaming abuse at someone is ever acceptable, but there is a level of rage that's forgiveable as human nature. Surely? I mean, as part of living. It's ridiculous to suggest that everyone treat their partner with respect every second of every day - even if it's what we should all attempt. There's a massive difference between having the occasional screaming match, where names are called and plates are smashed - and a consistent level of daily abuse. I do wonder how many times the police are called as a tactic in 'winning' an argument. Don't get me wrong - I'm not belittling the numbers here, but I do think there might be a couple of issues that are overlooked.
Personally, I think whatever can be done to help victims of abuse - male, female, domestic or public - should be done. However, I'm not sure people are getting to the bottom of things. Violence seems to be viewed in a very strange light. In my opinion, all types of violence are unacceptable. The only time it's appropriate to raise your hands to someone is in self-defence - and if everyone accepts that violence is taboo, self-defence shouldn't be necessary. I don't care if you're a man hitting a woman, a woman hitting a man, a man hitting a man, a woman a woman - all are utterly, totally despicable. It's the imposing of will by a physically stronger person over a weaker. It's nature's greatest mistake. Being able to control a situation simply because you can batter people into submission is a way to total destruction. But time and time again you see the glorification of violence. Instead of moving away from the idea that solving problems by having a good punch up, the popular media - especially in the US - now seems to be suggesting that women should be karate kicking, wielding guns and fist-fighting with the best of them.
One of the generalisations about the sexes is that women are less violent. This is a GOOD thing. Nowadays we're supposed to cheer Lara Croft, Temperance Brennan, Miss Jupiter - all the butt-kicking, wise-cracking heroines being churned out by the entertainment industry. Frankly, I'd take iron-willed, sharply intelligent Florence Nightingale over that lot any day.
Violence begets violence. We've known that ever since humanity was able to think introspectively. But what do we do? Continue to show it as aspirational, as escapist fantasy. And now you can show men and women in fist fights (where women almost always win) on prime time television. It's a bit sick, if you think about it. I know, I know - you're not really supposed to think about it. It's just entertainment ... right?
Except entertainment tends to reflect those situations the population deem socially desirable - and a new breed of superhero women who kick the living bollox out of men is just fiiiine.
Not to me. I believe the only thing that's going to reduce abuse of all kinds is education, and as so many people take their social education from the TV, I don't think it's wise to continue to portray violence as second nature - and 'cool' to boot. Personally, I think a man beating up a man is as despicable as a man beating up a woman. It's still a stronger person dominating a weaker one for their own sense of power. However, there is a difference between two people looking for a fight and battering each other in some ridiculous primeval power-struggle. Two twats make a fair fight, I suppose.
We don't live in Utopia, so there are a couple of things that need to be done. Firstly, I think every girl over the age of 13 should be given every opportunity to build her confidence. Something happens to girls around that age; often they go from being happy, secure queens of their own lives to blushing every time they're called on in class, never making a wise-crack, believing they're somehow not good enough. At the same time, boys start developing their own brand of confidence, which can be even more intimidating to girls. So: girls need to be encouraged to perform; to show off their intellectual or physical skills (and if your mind immediately turned to a dirty joke then, just ponder what that means for women - that their physicality is almost instantly related to sex) and to be able to hold their own in mixed groups.
I'd like to give a shout out, at this minute, to the world of horses. In this area, girls undertake a very physical, very difficult task and compete in mixed society, excelling as often as their male counterparts. Horses are an area where men and women take part equally, with neither party thinking they're a 'guest' in the other sex's arena. The women I've met who are wholly involved in this area tend to be brimming with confidence. Trouble is, it's also a class issue. It does tend to be moneyed children who get involved - and that means it's difficult to know whether it's class that helps confidence as well. I think it does - but I also think there are more moneyed girls out there with a lack of confidence than assurance. Put 'em all on ponys! In fact, there should be a government initiative, right now, that puts every girl and boy on a pony.
This is a big fat ramble, ain't it? Bascially, to sum up, what I'm trying to say is that women lose their confidence at a very young age, making them susceptible to patterns of abuse. If we can create an uber-race of strong, confident women, it will go some distance to combatting domestic abuse. I'm NOT saying that abused women just need to stand up for themselves - I'm saying that if they learn from a young age that they're worth more than a violent partner gives them, it should help cut the numbers of people in abusive relationships. They may well be able to cope with verbal abuse without letting it dominate them, too, which would nip the start of a bad pattern in the bud.
This is an unfinished, unpolished thought stream. There are issues here too delicate for my clumsy thoughts - but the nutshell is: give a sense of strength and power back to the abused, and teach those who may be vulnerable from a young age that they have worth.
Now I must go and massage someone.
Shall I Be Motherf***er?
The neighbours duly obliged by showing very willing, and we ended up with 3 of the local lay-deez pouring Earl Grey down their necks (or Assam - yes, we provided a choice) and tucking into the scones. I'm delighted to report that there wasn't a nibbler amongst them.
The first guest was Assisi, who is a hugely friendly golden retriever of a woman, who we met because she walks her collie - Zach - up our road twice every day. She also always has an old man in tow. I think she walks them both. It became ridiculous that we were exchanging friendlier and friendlier waves without speaking, so we eventually stopped the car and said hello. She was delightful, and since then we've had her round for dinner with Epona & Shah (direct neighbours). She's bats about animals, and brings treats for the dogs as her contribution to the gathering - as well as treats for us. This time she arrived bearing a vast and utterly delicious lemon cake, made with condensed milk. And, presumably, other stuff - otherwise it would be a bit wet.
Our second guest was our neighbour-but-one, Ina. We met her at our New Year first foot, and she struck me as slightly shy but with a lifetime of having to talk to hunters, shooters and fishers behind her, and thus the skills to cover her shyness. Anyway, she was very happy to come along, and brought some home made apple jelly.
Lastly was Epona - whom, after running 30 minutes late, I called to remind. She'd taken some cough medicine, fallen asleep and completely forgotten. Anyway, she legged it down the road and was soon scarfing down scones with the best of us.
So that - along with Fisher 'n' me - was our merry band. We had a good chinwag, ate huge amounts, and parted on good terms some 2 hours later. And what was my experiment? Why, here's the menu:
6 orange & Grand Marnier scones with macadamia nuts.
6 white cherry infused scones with black cherries inside.
6 raspberry, ginger and Pimms scones.
Tray of cream-cheese brownies, served with rhubarb and ginger jam.
And, believe it or not, they were all munched with much glee. This, of course, has done nothing for my bid to lose the hideous amount of weight I've gained over the last few months. And when I say hideous, I mean hideous. In a desperate bid to get back into the swing of exercise, I forced myself to go to the gym this evening. This is the result:
1 mile run from gate to gym, 1.1 mile (almost), in 12 minutes. Long, slight uphill. Short but steep downhill.
1 fast mile on treadmill in gym - 9.03 mins. Is this my fastest? I really should keep track. I know I did 9.04 at some point. But, on the other hand, I was using the crap machine which has a habit of hiccupping and nearly sending me flying off the back every time I speed it up or slow it down. It's a feffin' death trap! So I hardly trust it to give an accurate pace, and it always seems easier to use, so who knows? Anyway, I felt pretty good about the mile. I also did some weights and a few tummy crunches. I've decided I really, really need to work on my abs as I'm lordotic and my hamstrings are very tight. Strong abs should help my posture and therefore my sacro-illiac probs too.
So that's that. Too much lard, not enough exercise, and a depressing amount of weight to lose. How shite is that? On the other hand, I can't seem to find anyone else with my scone recipes, so I may indeed have invented new scone flavours. That's something to celebrate - and so is the loveliness of having sociable, chatty, foodie neighbours.
*See Vicar of Dibley for reference.
Thursday, 5 March 2009
Spa, Blar & Spar
My first impression of the hotel was disappointing. I'd expected a country house hotel. In fact, Cameron House is one of those hotels who very obviously cater for opulence and therefore lose 99% of their charm. It's like a small version of Gleneagles, complete with prominent helicopter on the lawn and sprawling accommodation park filled with luxury chalets. I, being uncomfortable with opulence (frankly, I think it's tasteless and crass) immediately tensed up and worried Koi would hate it.
We left Helga with the valet, who probably caught cholera from her interior as I never saw him again, and went to check in. Our rooms were pleasant, but no better than any better-than-average hotel's, and we spent very little time there before setting off in search of some lunch. We didn't want to overdo it because, thanks to a windfall from the gods, Martin Wishart's had had a canellation the previous day and we were bumped up from waiting list to guest list. Huzzah! So we went to the boathouse. While it was pleasant enough, they'd gone a little crazy with the New England country-club theme, making it all a little self-conscious. The food was good, though, as you'd expect from paying £12.50 for a salad. Delightfully, Fisher picked up the lunch tab - and I was much appeased by the enormous vat of very good coffee they placed in front of me. We also had very delicious puddings - me a bannoffee pie, Koi a praline terrine, Fisher ... something else. Can't remember, but she was very pleased with it. (Not wanting to overdo it at lunch went rather out the window when we saw the pudding menu).
As we finished our puddings, Koi got a call from Pro saying he'd arrived and would meet us in the lobby. We finished up and went to greet him. We grabbed a quick dram at the bar, then he and I decided to head off for a spot of golf, while Koi and Fisher walked the dogs and yammered contentedly.
The golf was, as always, mildly hilarious. We both managed to hit a few good shots, but being winter greens it was more like playing 'bog golf'. We squelched our way round 7 of the 9 holes in an hour and a half, during which time I managed to bag a birdie, sink a 30 foot putt, lose one ball, find one ball, fail to hit a single decent shot off the fairway, and collect an enormous quantity of goose shit on the wheels of my trolley. Pro hit some good shots off the fairway, was consistently good on the green, lost several balls, and managed not to kill a goose. I cracked up when Pro, irate at having a poor run of drives off the tee, decide to welly one with a wood - on a 193 metre hole. Naturally he hit it clean and true, at which it flew about 150metres beyond the flag, practically making it to the next hole. The moment he gets his swing right, he's just going to walk all over everyone. He can hit it further than anyone I've ever seen. He's bagged a 350m drive at the range - and he's a total beginner. Frightening stuff.
After bog golf, Pro and I headed back to the hotel to meet Fisher & Koi, who'd been for a swim in the leisure centre. Time was knocking on, but I noticed in passing that the centre had squash courts - so Pro and I raced down for a game. We managed to bag 80 mins of court time and had a great time exhausting ourselves racing up and down. We were due at Wishart's at 7.30. We finished our game (last one 9-8) at 7.10, changed into finery in the leisure centre changing rooms (I forgot a hairbrush, which could have been interesting but luckily my hair decided not to play silly buggers) and raced off to meet Fisher and Koi.
Now, I'd like to make mention of a small fact here. I was wearing sweaty squash clothes. I took a shower. I washed my hair. I then changed into a dress. I put on high heels. I even donned make-up. I don't think much of myself visually at the best of times, but I think I looked pretty good. Pro was complimentary, which was very gentlemanly of him. It took both of us just under 20 minutes to get ready and look sharp. We went across to the main hotel lobby to meet our 'Others' - only to discover neither of them were there. I went to my room, Pro to his. I found Fisher putting the finishing touches on her pampering, and we went down together - now a couple of minutes late. Pro then emerged and told us to head on through to the restaurant, as Koi was still doing her hair and would be late. So we three went to Martin Wishart's without her and enjoyed a G&T. She was 10 minutes behind us.
I say nothing. Only - 20 MINUTES! GAME OF SQUASH! READY ON TIME! and ALL THE TIME IN THE WORLD! 10 MINUTES LATE!!
That is all.
Except that I should also, for fairness, add that she lost her necklace and was hunting for it like a maniac, so might not have been quite so late had that not occurred. Anyway, it didn't matter a jot, except to make me ponder the selfishness of vanity. I'm not talking about Koi here - she lost her necklace, which can happen to anyone and is a perfectly valid excuse for lateness, and it really didn't matter as we were only a short walk from the rooms and could enjoy a comfortable drink while waiting - but there does seem to be an acceptability to people - mostly women - thinking it's more important to go through the ritual of primping than be on time. So, because the mascara has to go on just so, and the hair has to be curled la, people are kept kicking their heels. Women - it's about time you got over yourselves. Know what? Nobody cares if you're wearing eye shadow or not. Nobody cares if your nails are varnished, and they certainly don't care if your toes are painted. Mascara, lippy, good hair - those are the staples. Maybe foundation if you're having a bad skin day. Everything else is superfluous and, if you're running late, should be ditched. Make up can be applied and look good in under 2 minutes.
Ok, enough. Let me emphasise again that the above wee rant only came into my head because Koi's lateness set off a train of thought - not because I think she was late through selfishness and vanity. I didn't care that she was late at the time, I don't care now, I never cared. Clear? Bon.
Wishart's was incredible. We spent over 3 hours at dinner, and every moment was a pleasure. We spent a great deal of time discussing whether to have the taster menu or not, and decided that yes, we would. It meant everyone having the same thing, but the advantage of this was that we got to discuss each course from the same page, as it were, and nobody got food envy. There were several courses - a starter, an intermediary, a fish course, a main course, a cheese course, and pudding. There were also amuse bouches and petit fours. Laughably, Koi admitted defeat over a teeny tiny pistachio macaroon. It was one of the amuse bouches. In fact, it was the very last amuse bouche. She groaningly complained that, had she not had pudding at lunch, the macaroon wouldn't have defeated her. I refrained from pointing out that she could have had all but one tiny mouthful of the lunchtime pudding in order to fit in the teeny tiny macaroon, as she was suffering at the time and I didn't want to make things worse.
Anyway, we had a truly wonderful time. Chat flowed, booze flowed, laughter flowed, and we revelled - revelled - in the food. It wasn't quite Devonshire Gardens but it was a bloody close second. And afterwards we retired to the bar for a whisky, Koi fell asleep on the sofa, then woke after her catnap raring to go, just as the rest of us became bleary eyed. An exciteable young man at the bar asked for a taxi, then came bouncing through the lounge squealing:
"I'm going by helicopter! Can you believe it?"
His thrill was quite endearing. Less endearing was his earlier decision to peer down my cleavage as I stood next to him at the bar. Forgive me but it's not like my cleavage is easy to miss. You don't need to stare directly down it to appreciate its canyonesque qualities. Still, he was pretty drunk. Maybe he was astonished at the sight of a 4 breasted woman ordering 8 drinks.
We retired, well content. But the treat was only half complete! Next day we'd booked ourselves into the spa for the afternoon.
Ah, the spa! Truly lovely - even for one such as me, who finds spas only moderate entertainment. We rose, had a tolerable breakfast at the Cameron Grill, and whiled away the morning playing a game of snooker. Koi and Pro kicked my and Fisher's butts, partly because of their superior skill, partly because we are so unutterably awful we kept giving them 4 point penalties. I have to say, Koi's a bit of a ringer at snooker - even when distracted by Pro, who loathes being outshone by Koi and attempted to sabotage her, even at the expense of his own team. Anyway, they won - and then it was time for the spa.
We headed off, having to drive there, and soon found ourselves decked in dressing gowns and swimming costumes, awaiting marvels.
Our first stop was the rooftop hot pool, which was delicious, delightful, de-lovely. We sat in the warm, warm water with steam rising all around us, letting the bubbly bubbles drift, with cold rain on our shoulders and faces. The view was obscured by mist and rain, but we could see just enough of Loch Lomond and the surrounding mountains to be enchanted. We could feel our muscles relaxing by the second. Wonderful.
Over the course of the afternoon we visited saunas, the swimming pool, steam rooms, the hydro pool, and the bistro. We'd thought we couldn't possibly fit in yet more food, but come 3pm we'd discovered a wee hole into which we could plug a club sandwich and a spot of pudding. It was fabulously decadent to sit eating elegantly presented food in our dressing gowns and swimsuits.
We finished it all off with another trip to the outdoor rooftop pool, which had filled with quite a few people but was no less delightful for all that. The view had cleared considerably, and there was now a little rainbow dancing over the hills. Suitably enchanted, we were able to end the trip on a real high.
Last but by no means least, I must mention that we'd arranged to split the Wishart's bill with Pro & Koi getting the food and Fisher & me getting the booze - but in a fit of fabulous generosity, Koi and Pro insisted on buying dinner themselves and would hear nothing against the plan. We are therefore slavishly grateful for their thoughtfulness, and for the experience of Wishart's on Loch Lomond, which will surely live long in my memory.
We bade farewell to a noticeably more chilled Koi & Pro and headed home, at long last - and here we've been for a whole week!
Now, I should mention yesterday's joys. I know - how much longer can I rabbit on? Not much, is the answer, but I do have some news.
You see, 2 days ago we sent Helga off to buymycar.com and got thruppence ha'penny for her. Put it this way - we then went into Edinburgh and bought a mattress. Helga didn't cover the cost. But pooh, I say! She was a clapped out old bucket, and getting any money at all for her was a miracle. Then, yesterday, we picked up our replacement.
This, my friends, is Baby.
Nobody puts her in a corner.
We took her for her first trip last night, down to Edinburgh to see Spar and Blar. They'd kindly recorded the Oscars for me, as I wanted to see just how appalling they were. I heard Hugh Jackman was doing song and dance numbers! I was so looking forward to mocking, jeering and laughing - but the highlight programme didn't show any of the cheese, only the winners. I was pleased Kate Winslet didn't cry - it would have been most un-British of her had she done so - and even more pleased by the whistle 'n' whoop communication between her and her Dad - which was, again, suitably British in its lack of reverence. I wonder why actors and film makers think anyone really gives much of a crap about their awards ceremonies? They think falling audiences is due to the manner in which they're presented? Like getting rid of the comedians as hosts will bring the audience flooding back? And Hugh Jackman performing song 'n' dance routines will have bums so firmly on seats you'll be prising soft furnishings from colons for weeks to come?
I think not.
Anway, the Oscars was a sad disappointment - very dull, no remarkable moments, no Michael Moore getting booed or Italian actors walking over seat backs - but the evening was great fun. Spar, in honour of the American theme, cooked American cuisine. God help us. This basically took the form of vast quantities of meat - hot dogs, steaks, Cajun chicken - and fried stuff. Naturally we therefore consumed vast amounts and felt sick. We also talked houses, as they're on the search for the perfect family home for Wee Baba and generally had a good yatter.
It was past 11 when we headed home, so I hope they're not both pie-eyed today. It was much appreciated as a pleasant mid-week interlude. Tomorrow I'm off to meet up with Pro, Badger, Janus and the Doctor for pizza and a movie. The movie is The Watchmen, which I'm thrilled to be getting to see in film form. I only read the graphic novel a few months ago, and I think it's genius - so here's hoping the film doesn't screw it to the wall.
Thanks for sticking with me, if you did - and if you gave up half way through, I don't blame you.
Until next time.